Thursday, 18 June 2015

Plate Tectonics in Brazil


Brazil is located on the South American Plate. The South American plate is a relatively large sized plate located below the continent, South America. The South American plate is bounded by African plate in the east, Nazca plate in the west, Antarctic plate and Scotia plate in the south and Caribbean plate and North American plate in the north. The Nazca plate has converged with South America over the past 70 million years. The relative motion varies, the fastest being 100mm/year and the slowest would be 50-55mm/year. South American plate and Nazca plates share the longest convergent boundary on earth, featuring Andes Mountains which extend over 7000 km. Nazca plates melt subduct below the South American plate, causing crustal dilation which then uses the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks to compress and form fold and thrust belt. Andes Mountains is current a home to more than 200 potentially active volcanoes as Nazca plate and South American plate still continue to converge. Active volcanoes are more likely to occur in convergence boundaries with a relatively steep angle of subduction. Flat slab subduction occurs in South American plate and Nazca plates and as a result four Andean Volcanic Belts form (Nothern Volcanic Zone, Central Volcanic Zone, Southern Volcanic Zone and Austral Volcanic Zone).

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Energy Assignment: Part 2


The main energy sources in Brazil are generated by hydropower, oil and mineral coal. Other sources used on a smaller scale include natural gas and nuclear power. Hydropower is the main source of electricity in Brazil. Brazil is the second-largest producer of hydroelectric power in the world and it depends on hydroelectricity for more than 75% of its electric power supply. Much of Brazil’s hydroelectric potential lies in the country’s Amazon River basin in the north, while the population also demands for electricity. Brazil has experienced its worst drought in 40 years, which contributed to electricity blackouts in many Brazilian regions. Brazil has spent more than $5 billion to subsidize electric utilities replacing lost hydroelectric generation with fossil fuel-fired generation, including large amounts of liquefied natural gas and has taken steps to provide backup generations. Brazil’s largest geographic size has required substantial investments in electricity transmission lines and support facilities. To support future economic growth, Brazil has invested in additional hydroelectric facilities. For instance the 14,000-megawatt Belo Monte dam along the Xingu River is expected to be completed in 2016, with a projected cost of $13 billion. Hydroelectric plants in flat areas tend to require much more land. The large Balbina hydroelectric plant, built in a flat area of Brazil, flooded 2,360 square kilometers. Flooding land for hydroelectric reservoir has an extreme environmental impact; it destroys forests, wildlife habitat, agricultural land, and scenic lands. Oil is another main source of Brazilian energy, responsible for 39.3% of energy in the country. Oil is used as an energy source for motor vehicles through the production of gasoline, diesel oil or kerosene; transportation is responsible for 33% of energy use in Brazil. Coal production is used for the generation of thermal energy and it is also used as a primary material for steel industries. The industry sector is responsible for 33.9% of the energy use.


Energy Assignment: Part 1



Solar Energy

            Pros/Benefits:
·      Renewable
·      Abundant
·      Sustainable
·      Environmentally friendly
·      Good availability
·      Reduces electricity costs
·      Shared solar
·      Silent
·      Financial support from government
·      Low maintenance
·      Clean energy source

            Cons/Drawbacks:
·      Intermittent
·      Installation is expensive
·      Energy storage is expensive
·      Associated with pollution
·      Exotic materials
·      Requires space
·      Low energy density
·      Some may find them unattractive




Wind Energy

            Pros/Benefits:
·      Green energy source and doesn’t cause pollution
·      Potential of wind power is enormous
·      Renewable and there is no way we can run out of it
·      Wind turbines are incredible space-efficient
·      Growing at 25% per year
·      Prices have decreased over 80% and are expected to keep decreasing
·      Operational costs associated are low
·      Good domestic potential

            Cons/Drawbacks:
·      Wind is fluctuating (intermittent) source of energy and not suited to meet the base load energy demand unless some form of energy storage is utilized
·      The manufacturing and installation of wind turbines require heavy upfront investments
·      Wind turbines can be a threat to wildlife
·      Noise is regularly reported as a problem



Nuclear Energy

            Pros/Benefits:
·      Relatively low costs
·      Base load energy
·      Low pollution
·      Lower carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses released into the atmosphere in power generation
·      Sustainable
·      High energy density

            Cons/Drawbacks:
·      Dangerous
·      High construction costs due to complex radiation containment systems and procedures
·      High subsidies needed for construction and operation
·      Long construction time
·      Target for terrorism

·      Radioactive waste

Monday, 15 June 2015

Case Study: Glacial Retreat



Himalayas

The Himalayas are the youngest and highest mountains of the world and have the largest concentration of glaciers outside polar caps. Glaciers in the Himalayas feed many important rivers of Asia including Ganga, Amu Darya, Indus, Brahmaputra, Irrawaddy, Salween, Mekong, Yangtze, Yellow, and Tarim. The northwest Himalaya region has warmed significantly at a higher rate than the global average. Due to the rising temperature in the Himalayas, Himalayan glaciers are melting faster than in other areas of the world. A glacier will happily advance in a healthy climate and retreat in response to a warmer climate. For example they’ve seen the Chhota Shigri glacier change in length due to change in temperature and the snowfall pattern in the Himalayas region from 1962 to 2008 for 46 years.



Glacier National Park

A warming climate is becoming popular in Glacier National Park. The Glacier Park area experienced an average 181 days every year when the temperature dipped below freezing between 1900 and 1979. Between 1980 and 2005, warming had reduced the number of below-freezing days to 152. The region now experiences, eight more days each year when temperature tops 90 degrees on average. This causes the glaciers to behave by shrinking in size because of the heat. Over the past decade, the National Park warmed at twice the rate of the overall planet. Many of the parks small glaciers are gone entirely and others are shrinking quickly.



Antarctica

Antarctica has a summer melting season, which produces many isolated snow-free areas, which are habitats for simple biological communities of primitive plants, microbes and invertebrates and breeding grounds for marine mammals and birds. Since records began, 50 years ago, mean annual temperatures have risen rapidly. Warming has been much slower in summer and spring than in winter or autumn but it still continues which causes glaciers to behave and respond by melting. The rate of warming in Antarctica is among the highest seen anywhere on Earth in recent times.

Impacts of Glacial Retreat

            Social Impacts
·      Number of tourists decrease as glaciers are disappearing
·      May displace people due to the rising sea level and rising rivers
·      Destroys agriculture
·      Destroys homes and buildings

            Environmental Impacts
·      Damages the nation
·      Affects wildlife
·      May alter flow of downstream rivers
·      May expand both land and marine habitats at the margins of glaciers
·      May reduce pressure on the crust causing instability of existing faults
·      Contribute to earthquakes

            Economic Impacts
·      Loss of tourists
·      Property destruction
·      Reconstructing the damage in the city
·      Relief and recovery costs

The effect of climate change on glaciers may not be evident at first sight and, while the surface area covered by the glacier may not be changing, but glaciers are thinning at a rate of about one meter per year. The Columbia Icefield is an important source of snow and ice melt for the Athabasca, Saskatchewan and Columbia rover basins. It is also considered vital for the tourism industry in Jasper and Banff national parks. Brewster Travel Canada operates snow coach tours, taking people out onto the Athabasca Glacier. The Rocky Mountains could lose up to 90 percent of its glaciers by 2100; this is a major tourist attraction that draws millions of tourists a year.


There are no glaciers in Brazil, but that doesn’t mean South America’s largest country doesn’t have melting glacier problems. Glaciers in the tropical Andes have shrunk 30-50% in the last four decades. Glaciers provide a vital water source to parts of Columbia, Peru, Bolivia and Argentina. The Amazon starts with glacier water in Peru so by the time it gets to Brazil the Amazon has plenty of other water sources. Brazil is investing in hydropower in Peru and that power source is likely to be impacted by reduced glaciers. There will be a bigger political problem in Brazil. The loss of glaciers is likely to dry up drinking water supplies and harm agricultural output, which can affect political stability. Brazil’s trade, transportation lanes, migration and border security will be impacted.